My LinkedIn "suggested reading" and "trending articles" included these two from today's Wall Street Journal:
Software Screening Rejects Job Seekers
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304821304577436172660...
and, then, this:
http://blogs.wsj.com/atwork/2012/05/30/nearly-half-of-us-firms-havi...
Now, I know enough basics about statistics to know that correlation does not necessarily equal causation... but I will be the first to admit that internal HR / recruitment, in their eagerness to lessen the impact of third-party fees, have quickly adopted the new technologies, and, unfortunately, often forget the most important aspect of any good (mind you, I said good) decent, third-party search firm is the breadth and depth of industry knowledge, company culture, and constant contact third parties have with the people they (internal HR) wish to hire. I always liked to think (and hope) we third-party recruiters have a bird's eye view (and it's really kinda cool) of the industries and niches that we serve, and that is a key strength that differentiates third-party from internal recruitment.
I just wrote a blog post last week that touched on this... and noticed a few posts from recruitingbloggers on ATS over the past couple days.
Thoughts, anyone? I would love to hear from any and all involved in the search process, skilled seekers, hiring managers having difficulty finding key skills, internal recruiters, and my third-party cohorts.
© 2013 Created by RecruitingBlogs.
Powered by
RecruitingBlogs.com was founded in 2007 and is the social network for recruiters and HR professionals with over 35,000 members and over 21,000 blog posts and forum discussions. Its global online network provides recruiters with a forum to share, interact and collaborate with one another.


