Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Ross Marian on March 23, 2009 at 5:51pm

We provide this service and we charge $5/Hr this is an all inclusive price, we use our own resources like JOB BOARDS, INTERNAL DATABASE,INFRASTRUCTURE ect..

Moreover, my Resume Sourcers would work during SUNSET U.S. and have the RESUMES ready for your Recruiters when they report to work in the Morning and thus enabling your Recruiters to work on multiple 'Job Orders'

We can even do a NO OBLIGATION, FREE TRIAL for you if you are interested, you may want to test waters with us before we decide on something concrete.

Write to me and we can start exploring options, my e-mail address is rossm@zenithsoft.com

Sincerely
Ross Marian

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Maureen Sharib on March 24, 2009 at 5:08am

It depends on what processes (is it staid Internet research or is it custom telephone sourcing results you expect? - There's a big difference! BIG difference!) I've written recently on this subject of rates. See here. Many VPs are pretty easy to find, listed on places like Hoovers but this depends really on the industry you're focusing on - in industries like banking (and consulting, to some extent) everybody's a VP! Director levels usually require more ferreting. Managers absolutely require phone ferreting to find and individual contributor levels -fergeddabout it! You MUST be able to use the phone to find the greater majority of these.
In general, as you go down into the organizational structure the phone is required more and more to find the people you seek and to find the people nobody's found before you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jill Rosenfield on March 24, 2009 at 8:44am

Hi Bob - My company (HireVelocity) uses Sheila Grecko and Associates. They typically charge around $95.00/hr. We've had good results from them. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. If you do follow up with them you are welcome to use me as a referral source.
Jill Rosenfield
HireVelocity
770-308-0203
jrosenfield@hirevelocity.net

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion