In follow up to today's RBC Daily:
You have to be mindful of the information you add in a job description. Clients and hiring managers might be clear with recruiters on exactly what they are looking for in a 'good' fit, but that does not mean such information should be part of your marketing efforts. One Connecticut based healthcare staffing firm learned this the hard way yesterday as Onward Healthcare agreed to pay $100,000 in civil penalties in a settlement reached with the U.S. Justice Department. They were accused of placing job ads that limited response to U.S. Citizens only. This is clearly a wrong practice as the Immigration and Nationality Act prevents organizations from discriminating on the basis of citizenship. A good reminder to keep your information focused on the actual opportunity and skills required for the role with less emphasis on the window dressing.
Question of the day: What is the worst thing you have seen included in a job description?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Valentino Martinez on March 30, 2012 at 2:09am
Permalink Reply by Nate Fischer on April 2, 2012 at 1:13pm Never in a job ad, but in a candidate's job description
"Mentally Retarded Social Worker"
The implications are endless, obviously she was a social worker that worked with mentally challenged people; however, that wasn't what the title implied.
"client is looking for 'window dressing' "...this means a young cute girl to stand around the front and look pretty!
I like the physical requirements for a desk job.
Last week I had a job description that let me know that candidates for the programmer position needed to have "dexterous thumbs"
Added by Lisa Zee on June 13, 2013
© 2013 Created by RecruitingBlogs.
Powered by
RecruitingBlogs.com was founded in 2007 and is the social network for recruiters and HR professionals with over 35,000 members and over 21,000 blog posts and forum discussions. Its global online network provides recruiters with a forum to share, interact and collaborate with one another.


