A lot of recruiters use free web chat services such as Skype and GoogleTalk to conduct interviews over the pre-recorded video option. What would you say are the benefits of using pre recorded videos over these free live options?
Tags: Agency Recruiting, Corporate Recruiting, Human Resources, Job Seekers, Recruiting Tools / Sourcing
Permalink Reply by Kerry Skemp on March 13, 2013 at 1:23pm IANAR (I am not a recruiter!), but I'd say that the different approaches test different skills. Asynchronous video comes closer to testing presentation skills and public speaking abilities, while an interview can tell you more about communication skills and how people interact with others. For any position that involves presenting information to groups, a video submission could be a great resume enhancer or part of the screening process, but I'd still expect companies to interview someone in real time at some point, particularly with a team. The way people interact in groups compared with one-on-one can also tell you a lot about their communication and work styles.
Permalink Reply by Matthew Evans on March 13, 2013 at 2:15pm
© 2013 Created by RecruitingBlogs.
Powered by
RecruitingBlogs.com was founded in 2007 and is the social network for recruiters and HR professionals with over 35,000 members and over 21,000 blog posts and forum discussions. Its global online network provides recruiters with a forum to share, interact and collaborate with one another.


