- Do you search for professionals on Google?
- Are you familiar with the Boolean logic in searches (AND/OR/NOTs)?
- Do you use advanced operators on Search Engines (like intitle:…
My LinkedIn account is having multiple problems with the functionality. It's happening for the second time in the past few months. I can't use my RPS account (it is a variation of LinkedIn Recruiter). I hope they will fix it again.
The nice LinkedIn managers, who support my RPS account, point out…Continue
... and yet it is a powerful sourcing tool, and it is free to use. (For the basic account it is also free, but you need to know your ways around to view the results. I will explain below.)
I am talking about the LinkedIn Signal. Even if you have the topmost account and all the power of people searching available to you, the Signal is an excellent addition with complementary ways to source. Namely, the…Continue
Added by Irina Shamaeva on January 8, 2013 at 2:00pm — No Comments
Here is a clarification on something fellow recruiters have been worried about. This is as of this morning and anything can change at any time, of course.
If you search for LinkedIn profiles on Google or on Bing (EXAMPLE), you might see an incomplete profile for those members who are either your 3rd level connections or are out-of-your-network and a suggestion to upgrade, when you click on the search results in Google. Don't worry;…Continue
If you have a basic or a low-paid account on LinkedIn, you can't see the full names of people who are your third level connections. You can't see the names of people outside your network. In LinkedIn Recruiter, which is the solution for corporations, you can see all names.
I didn't realize up till I was at the #sourceIn event yesterday at the LinkedIn HQ in Mountain View, that agencies with the top solution wouldn't see the names either. Now, LinkedIn has decided to open up…Continue
LinkedIn is “the” top place for many recruiters and for many people I have met “LinkedIn” is almost equals “sourcing”. Everyone we had placed in the last year was initially contacted on LinkedIn.
We all agree on the importance of not spamming candidates and carefully reviewing their profiles before we reach out.
However, LinkedIn's nature is not fully understood by many, I think. Here's what I read on a blog post on ERE today: “Examine the resultant profile summaries…. “Red…Continue
Added by Irina Shamaeva on September 5, 2012 at 5:15pm — No Comments
Here are some sample test questions for the People Sourcing Certification Program:
Added by Irina Shamaeva on August 29, 2012 at 2:17pm — No Comments
I had noisy roadwork outside of my office this morning and somehow this made me think of this list. :) I am interested in what fellow recruiters would think about it.
My top impression from the Australian sourcing…Continue
Added by Irina Shamaeva on August 23, 2012 at 11:59pm — No Comments
Q: What do many people do when they start to think about their career? A: They update their LinkedIn profile.
Up till recently tracking, which members update their profiles, was only possible for your first level connections, as an example, by subscribing to Bullhorn Reach.
It is now possible to watch for all the skills and title changes by using the LinkedIn Signal. This is available to all members and is free to…
I love LinkedIn! It has been bringing us more matching candidates and business connections than everything else combined out there. For my own recruiting business LinkedIn accounts for 100% placed candidates in the last twelve months and a large chunk of sourcing information that I submit to others when sourcing.
Yet taking the full advantage of LinkedIn is not straightforward! There are numerous obstacles and misleading marketing messages, blogs, and tutorials. Some LinkedIn members…Continue
Participants of the People Sourcing Certification Program go through 60 questions for the Level 1 and 80 questions for the Level 2 at the end of the Program. We use the tests as an additional opportunity to practice and apply the sourcing skills.
As several participants have pointed out, and as one of them wrote, the Program actually makes you “think” instead of just plugging in some answers and…Continue
I believe that everybody who searches for professional people online – recruiters, sourcers, sales, marketing, business development people – need to aim to answer yes to these 20 questions below, to remain competitive and productive. (Do you agree?)
Added by Irina Shamaeva on May 18, 2012 at 11:30am — No Comments
Join us for a Webinar on April 11
Space is limited.
Reserve your Webinar seat now at:
Lots has changed in Boolean search syntax and algorithms the last six months or so. Pretty much…
Added by Irina Shamaeva on April 9, 2012 at 3:20pm — No Comments
April 5, 2012
Remember this recent post on Mashable Google: Sorry, Twitter, We Don’t Index the @ Symbol? Those of us on the Boolean Strings group, who are search syntax perfectionists and are tired of seeing yet another suggestion to search for @*.com or *@ibm.com, etc. to find emails,…
Added by Irina Shamaeva on April 5, 2012 at 1:55pm — No Comments
March 12, 2012
I am happy to announce our Sourcing Certification program.
Instead of using the term “Sourcing” (as we are used to in recruiting), and per a great suggestion I got, I will call the discipline “Peoplesourcing”, which means finding information…Continue
Added by Irina Shamaeva on March 12, 2012 at 12:04pm — No Comments
Added by Irina Shamaeva on March 7, 2012 at 3:14pm — No Comments
Recruiters and Sourcers:
Do your potential candidates reply to your introductory messages? I’d like to share our experience on what works and what doesn’t.
Added by Irina Shamaeva on February 17, 2012 at 12:15pm — No Comments
This was a question on LinkedIn a few weeks ago; I thought it was interesting; unfortunately it didn't get too many responses. I have pasted my answer below. What would you say?
[here's my answer:]
LinkedIn is the top resource. It is even more useful when it's part of your sourcing strategy, i.e. is not the only social media source. …
Added by Irina Shamaeva on February 6, 2012 at 3:00pm — No Comments