Most people who become recruiters do not last. There are many reasons for that. Poor hiring decisions and inadequate training being high on the list.
But there is another key reason why so few people actually last in the hurly-burly world of agency recruiting.
It’s a frigging hard job!
So I know that sometimes you question why you do it. There are times you hate what you do. There are days you go home feeling deflated, worn-out and frankly, useless.
The world is littered with ‘ex-recruiters’, burnt out, scarred and resentful about their all-too-short recruiting career.
Seriously, the guy who cut my hair last week told me he had ‘been a recruiter once’.
It’s true too that being a recruiter can be the greatest job of all, but even so, to survive you have to know the pitfalls, prepare for them, minimise their impact where you can, and push through the inevitable challenges this job will throw you.
So what to do?
************************************************************************************************************
Subscribe to The Savage Truth and ‘Like” our Facebook page to enure you get your recruiting brain-food fix.
Comment by bill josephson on January 11, 2013 at 9:59am Lots of excellent comments on this topic.
To Dyll--you've hit the essence of what recruiting's become--commoditized. Wasn't that way back in 1980 when I began--it was more like the wild West as cowboys.
Today, IMO, recruiters need to be able to perform a role HR is unable to. They have social media, web sites, doing Google/Boolean searches, some have dedicated teams of 50 recruiters solely scouring the Internet, in this economy scores of people hitting those web sites with a surprising number being good enough to be considered. So we are definitely competing with HR, the resistance to working with us greater, and the assignments we receive are usually "problematic" jobs--if you're lucky your contact will truthfully share what the "problem" with it actually is.
Being indispensible is the key. Having a niche where you're valued by your client being the "go to" person. Finding passive/insivible candidates companies absolutely can't. Dyll's doing it the right way. But any financially rewarding/attractive business (or personal) relationship/situation we can always count on competition as someone else will want it--as Dyll expressed.
Being relevant in the marketplace is crucial to survival today. Finding out what that relevance is--even for this 32 year recruiter--isn't always easy and I'd get long winded explaining why. But if your client can do it, they likely don't need/don't want you.
Ashley, you raise an important point. That was my experience. I changed going from a small to a national chain agency for 10 years before becoming self-employed. Your environment experience counts for a lot.
Hiring teams of employers too experience the same - candidate saying no after all the effort. Professional recruiters can address this by changing their mindset, from 'seller of a thing' to 'manager/adviser of a talented human being'. Think like the manager of a star spokesperson or an actor. Now, it's impossible for recruiters to act like manager for hundreds of candidates. But even couple of steps walked in that direction will help the recruiter find a job that the candidate is more likely to go for. A car that can't say no for its sale also can't come back to you later asking to be sold. A candidate can come back to you for next job if she knows you understand her well enough to find her the right job and you are representing her to the employer, not the other way round!.
Comment by bill josephson on January 11, 2013 at 11:01am Assuming the position's a match, Mahesh, much is driven IMO on candidate timing, whether there's something driving the candidate out of their present employer, and/or if the opportunity is clearly a differential step above their current situation.
If a candidate's pretty happy and nothing driving them out the door the closer the position emulates their current one the less chance of a hire from what I've experienced.
And in this economy the employers seem to demand a candidate have close to 100% of the skills required or they keep looking. In a good economy the norm is 70-80% with that 20-30% the candidate doesn't have being a motivating factor in their being interested in the position.
Comment by Barbara Goldman on January 14, 2013 at 11:53am What a great post. Thanks, everything you said is true. There is no crying in recruiting. One of the big problems when hiring the 'sales personality' is that everyone wants instant gratification. You have to be in this for the long haul. It takes emotional stability, and maturity. It knocks the daylights out of you, yet the successes are highly satisfying.
Comment by Kristin Yates on January 14, 2013 at 2:28pm I'm right there with what Sandra said; I'm so glad I read this on a Monday!
Woo - hoo. Saying it how it is once again Greg!
Comment by Drue De Angelis on January 16, 2013 at 3:04pm Strong work, Greg! But one question for you; Why not refuse to accept this statement "Sure, a tiny percentage of our work is retained," Retained is an option, and it removes the vast majority of the headaches. It is , without question, more rewarding to remove the risk and work only on "a sure thing." I know it isn't easy to sell the retainer, but its VERY MUCH worth the effort!
Comment
Added by Lisa Zee on June 13, 2013
Added by Rebecca B. Sargeant on June 18, 2013
© 2013 Created by RecruitingBlogs.
Powered by
RecruitingBlogs.com was founded in 2007 and is the social network for recruiters and HR professionals with over 35,000 members and over 21,000 blog posts and forum discussions. Its global online network provides recruiters with a forum to share, interact and collaborate with one another.



You need to be a member of RecruitingBlogs to add comments!
Join RecruitingBlogs