I thought it was a great show today. That was my feeling while we were doing it. The pace was pretty fast, there was some relevant content and the guest seemed comfortable with the "culture" of the show. So, of course, I got slammed on the aftershow. I don't know what it is with these guys. They either over-rate me or under-rate me but they are rarely spot on.
Mind you, that's what I like about the Recruiting Animal Show - they get to air their opinions even if I don't agree. Though I must say that I was taken to task for muzzling conversation about explosive and irrelevant topics. But I don't care.
And, yes, I did cut Nate off and he's smart but sometimes he sounds like he's a professor in a lecture hall. And, yes, I did cut Carmen off - but if her point is clear after the first ten words why does she have to go on for twenty? Tell me, I want to know.
I thot it was a great @animal show today - the aftershow people always over-rate or under-rate - when they're not talking about muskrats— Recruiting Animal (@animal) April 4, 2012
@animal - 4 some reason - I cannot focus on your show 2day.....Alleve is looking really good - or a bowl of cereal— Cathy Mannis (@CathyMannis) April 4, 2012
is it me or does it seem like @animal wants 2 hear himself talk 2day more than his guest?— Cathy Mannis (@CathyMannis) April 4, 2012
If someone tells me I'm part of an "exclusive few" my radar goes up. @animal— MaureenSharib (@MaureenSharib) April 4, 2012