I've heard a lot of Recruiters say "I only work on a retained basis". I've done both and see benefits to each. Anyone have an opinion?
Edward Piontek
Pulse Jobs LLC
Comment by Rayanne on January 14, 2011 at 10:03am Wow, Jeff..., I think this should be a blog. Agreeing with Pam, to each his own.
I have worked on retainer and on contigency - also worked in-house as a corporate recruiter. They each have their benefits.., I think that success not only comes from within, but also from with out. Meaning, in each type of recruiting, if you are not surrounded by people you like, in an sector you like, you will probably struggle with being successful.
And on top of the "like" factor is the support and/or success-based factor. I worked in-house for a venture-backed, new tech company. It was fantastic, I loved the people I worked for and those that I was able to recruit into our company. Management was incredibly supportive, but, ultimately, upper management failed us when funds and big decisions were mismanaged. So, the work I did and the others in each individual role, didn't matter - the company still failed. Challenge is the key in each environment - if you are challenged, growth is sure.
And the lessons you take with you will always sharpen your steel.
That's all very interesting Jeff but having been mostly contingent for over three decades my observation is that retained recruiters who do not deliver don't get repeat business, contingency recruiters who don't deliver don't get repeat business. I work at the same level whether i am on retainer or working contingency and have little problem getting listings on a contingency basis. I have many times been told that a company had a retained search going on but if i wanted to work on it they would consider my candidates. I delivered the candidate they hired so the next search was mine first before the company would consider giving anyone a retainer.
My take is that it is delivery that builds a relationship that builds business. Retainers are good when it is a difficult search that will take months, involve a lot of time, advertising expense, etc with the client expectation for time to hire being lengthy.
Comment
Added by Lisa Zee on June 13, 2013
Added by Rebecca B. Sargeant on June 18, 2013
© 2013 Created by RecruitingBlogs.
Powered by
RecruitingBlogs.com was founded in 2007 and is the social network for recruiters and HR professionals with over 35,000 members and over 21,000 blog posts and forum discussions. Its global online network provides recruiters with a forum to share, interact and collaborate with one another.



You need to be a member of RecruitingBlogs to add comments!
Join RecruitingBlogs