When I started out in sales, I was a lonely copy jock – that is what we called them in the old days. I worked for Lanier Worldwide as an “Account Executive.” Life consisted of 20 cold calls, 20 phone
connects and 2 pre-set appointments per day, EVERY day to make it in that
business. And of course, being as
by-the-numbers as I am, I tracked all of my activity. Some of my diligence was due to keep myself
motivated and some was just to keep my job if I didn’t sell anything that
month.



When I sold something, I always went back and analyzed my prospecting activities to see where I could cut back and where I needed to beef up my actions. Then I calculated the
ratios. 10 cold calls : 1 appointment :
1/5 closed sale, for example. It was
amazing … and a little disheartening at first.
Like a giant mirror propped up to show me how good or bad I was at
getting results.



As I progressed in that business and with my solution-sales technique, I noticed that the ratio of closed sales or “orders” to prospecting activities increased dramatically. No
longer did I need to make 100 cold calls for a sale. Now, it was down to 50. I was indeed working smarter, while still
working hard – I made the same amount of cold calls per day, I just sold more.



Ratios are very important in Recruiting as they help gauge results with hiring managers, too. As you develop a relationship of trust, the ratio of qualified candidates
submitted to hires increase – and the converse is true. When a new manager or recruiter comes into
the fold, it generally takes time for them to trust your judgment when it comes
to prescreening people for their team. It
is only natural and the number of hires to interviews will go up as the
recruiter learns the nuances of the manager’s hiring style. Ratios help to identify possible trouble
areas and if actions are resulting in hits for the company or misses. Over the course of twelve months working with
one particular hiring manager, my submittal rate went from 17 to 2 submittals
per hire – it can happen.



Clients, same thing. Experienced recruiters like Bill Radin, (Recruiter’s Digest*) are heard to say it should take between 5 and 10 submittals to land a placement, and
Bill’s average is THREE! (I bow before
thee). If one client is bucking the
trend and going through 15 or 20 interviews for one position, it could be a
case of “trying” and not “buying” – and a serious drain on resources. I might not drop that order but I wouldn’t
drop everything else to source it, either.
If every client in your pipeline is interviewing at least 15 people
before offering the position, better put that mirror up and look for ways to
improve your consultative and sourcing skills.



So, what does this tell you about time management and skilled recruiting efforts? Plenty! Does it tell all about the sourcing and hiring process? Of course not, but
ratios can help diagnose barriers and pinpoint a solution. A simple ratio, if tracked and viewed as part of a trend, can become a strategic
measurement and a barometer for productivity.
Just knowing the numbers is half
of it – now take it home and improve them.





Works Sited


*http://www.billradin.com/recruiters_digest_2005-01.htm

Views: 25

Tags: #client, #consultant, #corporate, #fish, #management, #progress, #recruit, #trend

Comment by Slouch on April 27, 2010 at 11:02pm
It's also good because you can know how much money you make every time you make a cold call or you get a resume or you send a resume to a client and how much you just made because you had a send out this morning. Also, how much money every meeting you have actually costs you or how much an afternoon off costs. It's hard to remember at the end of the day as a recruiter that you made a lot of money today even though you made no placement. It's a good post. I like Bill Radin.
Comment by Ken Forrester on April 28, 2010 at 9:30am
Thanks Nikole for reminding us that recruiting is very hard work.
You must understand the market that you serve including the candidates, hiring managers and the numbers process to be successful. It is also an irony that when you become proficient at what you do; the focus is no longer on your efficiency, but instead on the fees that you are earning. The perception from the outside is that recruiting appears to be “so easy even a caveman can do it”. Just send in a few resumes and get paid a tidy sum. I guess that perception is now the bad reality for good recruiters.

Comment

You need to be a member of RecruitingBlogs to add comments!

Join RecruitingBlogs

Sponsored Video

Marketing Partners

Upcoming Webinar

RecruitingBlogs on Twitter

Recruiting Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2014   Created by RecruitingBlogs.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

scroll to the top